NYU GSTEM (http://cims.nyu.edu/gstem/) is a six-week program designed
for young women in their junior year of high school. During this
program, you will live at home and commute to New York University and
internship sites throughout New York City! You will have an opportunity
to work on a small project alongside researchers in the mathematical and
physical sciences, produce a brief paper about your work, and deliver a
short oral presentation to your peers. You will be supported by
experienced STEM tutors who will be matched to your area of interest and
provide guidance throughout the program.
Apply online starting on February 1st!
Program Dates: July 7 - Aug 15, 2014
Monday, July 7-Friday, July 11: Orientation Week
Lectures, workshops, and information sessions on campus to help you prepare for the program.
Monday, July 14-Tuesday, August 12: Internship Weeks
Internship research four days per week and one campus day each week.
Wednesday August 13-Friday, August 15: Final Convocation
Program completion with final lectures, papers, and student project presentations.
Tuition Cost: $2,750
A generous grant from the Sloan Foundation has underwritten this program.
Scholarships may be available for students who cannot afford the full tuition.
For questions, contact Dr. Matthew Leingang, Rebecca Stern, or Dr. Mark Saul: gstem@courant.nyu.edu
This blog is a collection of student comments on the concepts and questions that they are examining as they are introduced to forensic science.
Wednesday, February 5, 2014
Thursday, January 23, 2014
Summer Programs
We have recently received information on two summer programs
available to students interested in pursuing the study of science over
the summer months.
![]() | |
http://www.summerscience.org/home/index.php |
![]() |
http://www.seas.upenn.edu/saast/ |
Thursday, December 26, 2013
Forensic Glass Analysis
On the last day of classes before the Holiday Recess, students in the Forensic Science class completed their Forensic Glass Analysis labs. Their written lab reports will be due at the end of week when they return to classes.
In the first lab the students, examined sheet glass, lead crystal glass, tempered glass and borosilicate glass samples visually distinguishing between the samples and measuring the densities of the different glass types. They also shattered sheet glass to study fracture patterns. They examined the broken edges to learn how a forensic scientist can determine which side of the glass was impacted to cause the fractures. At the end of this lab the students examined six glass samples related to two hypothetical crime scenarios.
In the second lab pictured here, the students were introduced to a new scenario which will involve the students, as the year proceeds, in using the analytical skills learned to process the different types of evidence. At the end of the year, the students will present all of the data they analyzed in a mock trial once they have solved the scenario.
The glass evidence they were analyzing came from glass found at an accident site in which three bodies were found in a burned vehicle found off a mountainside road and an abandoned vehicle found far from the accident and thought to be driven from the accident scene by a person of interest. The students were using Becke lines, produced by the refraction of light, to identify and compare the different glass samples. They were give three different liquids (each with unique refractive indices) to be used to determine the refractive indices of the different glass samples. They had two reference samples (bottle glass and headlight glass)to compare to the two crime scene samples (glass from the vehicle crash site and glass from the abandoned vehicle).
In the first lab the students, examined sheet glass, lead crystal glass, tempered glass and borosilicate glass samples visually distinguishing between the samples and measuring the densities of the different glass types. They also shattered sheet glass to study fracture patterns. They examined the broken edges to learn how a forensic scientist can determine which side of the glass was impacted to cause the fractures. At the end of this lab the students examined six glass samples related to two hypothetical crime scenarios.
In the second lab pictured here, the students were introduced to a new scenario which will involve the students, as the year proceeds, in using the analytical skills learned to process the different types of evidence. At the end of the year, the students will present all of the data they analyzed in a mock trial once they have solved the scenario.
The glass evidence they were analyzing came from glass found at an accident site in which three bodies were found in a burned vehicle found off a mountainside road and an abandoned vehicle found far from the accident and thought to be driven from the accident scene by a person of interest. The students were using Becke lines, produced by the refraction of light, to identify and compare the different glass samples. They were give three different liquids (each with unique refractive indices) to be used to determine the refractive indices of the different glass samples. They had two reference samples (bottle glass and headlight glass)to compare to the two crime scene samples (glass from the vehicle crash site and glass from the abandoned vehicle).
Katie prepares slides of the various glass samples in the liquids for her forensics team to exam with their microscope. |
Kylie and Kailey are labeling the slides their team member Katie had prepared before the examine them under the microscope . |
Nick watches as his partner, Alex, examines one of the samples their team prepared to determine the position of the Becke line. |
Patrick examines his team's sample while team members Emma a Joanna log the teams data for the different samples. |
Katie examines her team's data while Vivian logs their data while Kristen avoids the camera by hiding behind her "let it snow" pillow. |
Sunday, December 1, 2013
DNA and Human Trafficking
Krissy Marrinan
Forensics
December 1st 2013
Current Events
DNA
and Human Trafficking
Chris Asplen
In this article, Chris Asplen talks about DNA and how it
has benefited the criminal justice system. Asplen explains how DNA is used to
solve cold cases and help the Innocence Project; a project where they release
wrongfully convicted people. He also goes into detail how human trafficking has
gotten worse and that the process has become similar to that of booking a trip
to “Disneyland”. Asplen explains that
having DNA as a resource will help put a stop to trafficking because it gives
the victims, a little encouragement and safety, to use their voice to stand up
against their abusers. By supporting the victims, police have the chance to
start to understand the patterns of the traffickers and possibly identify some
of the criminals. Asplen hopes that somehow DNA will put and end to human
trafficking and all injustice that has previously happened.
The
information in this article really opened my eyes to the possibility that human
trafficking could come to screeching halt if DNA could play a role in capturing
the horrible criminals. “At a profit margin of $32 billion a year,
second in magnitude only to trafficking of illegal drugs, as many as 27 million
men, women, and children are victims of modern slavery”. From this quote, it is
clear that human trafficking is a real problem, and somehow needs to stop.
Young teenage girls are the target for human trafficking and this effect many
of us, because we all know someone who is a young teen, and realizing that
someone her age is going through this is horrifying.
Though
I agree with much of what Chris Asplen is writing, I though some of the points
that he was making were not connected to what I originally thought the article
was going to be about, so it mislead me a little bit. But overall I really thought that Asplen made
a compelling argument to why DNA could really put a dent in human trafficking.
http://www.forensicmag.com/articles/2013/08/dna-and-human-trafficking#.UptWD6Wn3wI
Asplen, Chris. "Forensic Magazine." Forensic Magazine., 28 Aug. 2013. Web. 01 Dec. 2013.
Tuesday, November 26, 2013
Crime Scene Presentations
The Forensic class was divided into six teams, each of which was comprised of four students. Each team had one class period to record and sketch the crime scene that was set up in the classroom. In the past, each student had to complete a formal lab report which included a rough and final sketch of the crime scene. This year, once the students had gathered their data and photographed their crime scene evidence, they were asked to produce a presentation of their findings. As you can see each team took a slightly different approach in how they presented the information that they had gathered.
The class will spend the remainder of the year examining some of the protocols that could be used to examine/verify/test the evidence found at a crime scene.
Video of Student Presentations
Video of Student Presentations
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)