Wednesday, October 14, 2015

Forensic Pathologist’s New Job Leaves 10 Colorado Counties in a Bind


Forensic Pathologist’s New Job Leaves 10 Colorado Counties in a Bind
SUMMARY
In the United States, there are different kinds of forensic laboratories set up, but when there are too few employees for one state, this can create quite a problem. For instance, Grand Junction-based forensic pathologist Dr. Robert Kurtzman has taken a job working out of state in Montana for another medical examiner’s office after working to serve 10 Colorado counties and one Native American tribe. After the retirement of another of his colleagues, he also had to travel to Durango, the county of which she covered. After his change of jobs, there has been talk of replacing Dr. Kurtzman since if there is a local forensics pathologist, “about five autopsies can be done a day” says Jann Smith, a coroner who works in La Plata, one of the counties Dr. Kurtzman originally covered. However, if the body has to be transported, it can take up to ten hours per body to be inspected. This is a huge problem that is primarily based around the coroner system, which ten states follow, including Colorado, which states that “coroners are elected and do not have to have a medical degree.” If the former is a case, someone who does will take over the postmortem inspection.
RELEVANCE
Unfortunately, Dr. Kurtzman’s decision to change jobs will result in the need for many counties to spend a lot of money and time transporting any bodies they have for autopsies in areas that do have coroners and medical examiners, such as Colorado Springs. In fact, because a lot of coroners do not have the expertise that a forensic pathologist like Kurtzman has, the need for medical examiners and forensic pathologists is higher than ever. Hence the coroner system seems to become obsolete; although, it is popular because coroners maintain a large amount of political power and influence, particularly in small counties not unlike the ones of which Dr. Kurtzman worked at. Although he is not worried about the competence of the coroners he used to work with, not everyone is equally at ease. His decision to move to another state and work for them may result in justice being delayed for the families of victims of unnatural causes because exporting bodies to and from small counties to cities will result in many complaints unless if a replacement is found. Currently, there is an unspecified replacement, but it does not mean that many important questions have been raised about the many systems used to run forensic labs, including: who is fit for being a coroner or any other forensics expert and how should people deal with the shortage of forensic pathologists and medical examiners? Is the coroner system outdated? Or is the medical examiner system just as flawed too? The situation in Colorado is just one of the many ways those questions can be answered.
CRITIQUE
Overall, this article was well-written with little to no errors. The article consistently follows standard English writing conventions and gives a lot of insight into the situation, providing solid details and examples to support the points the writer makes. Also, it flows nicely and maintains the reader’s attention from the hook until the very end. Last but not least, this article is concise yet has enough detail to provide a fleshed outlook of the circumstances regarding Dr. Kurtzman’s change in jobs and how that impacts the rest of his state and nation as well. Still, there were a few crucial problems. Jessica Pace, although she writes well, provides little to no information on several of the locations she mentioned. Even though this is a county newspaper, the least Pace could do is take into consideration that people outside of the state is able to read it since it was posted on the Forensic Magazine after all. Secondly, a select few of the quotations Pace uses are varied awkwardly due to the switch from using quote punctuation to using none. Paragraph breaks are often unnecessary and many paragraphs are made up of one sentence when ideas could have been connected better. Above all, not everyone has learned about the crime lab systems in the United States and though Pace did provide some information, particularly regarding the coroner. medical examiner and combined systems, there was plenty more that could have been explained. However, those flaws are just nitpicking and the article was enjoyable and easy to read for just about everyone.
CITATION
Pace, Jessica. "The Durango Herald 10/13/2015 | Forensic Pathologist’s New Job Leaves 10 Western Colorado Counties in a Bind." The Durango Herald. The Durango Herald, 13 Oct. 2015. Web. 14 Oct. 2015. <http://www.durangoherald.com/apps/pbcs.dll/article?AID=%2F20151013%2FNEWS01%2F151019874%2F0%2FFRONTPAGE%2FForensic-pathologist%E2%80%99s-new-job-leaves-10-Western-Colorado-counties-in-a-bind&template=printpicart>.

3 comments:

Anonymous said...


Pace, Jessica. "The Durango Herald 10/13/2015 | Forensic Pathologist’s New Job Leaves 10 Western Colorado Counties in a Bind." The Durango Herald. The Durango Herald, 13 Oct. 2015. Web. 14 Oct. 2015. .

There are many aspects of Michelle’s article review that were very well done. However three things stood out to me in particular. First, I like how she split up the review into three different sections. This makes it easier for a reader to follow along with what is being said. Second, I found it very convenient that after something was presented, an example was placed immediately after. This was done in the first paragraph when Grand Junction-based forensic pathologist Dr. Robert Kurtzman was introduced. Third, the review was written very well and i like how the critique of the article was very honest. This review could have been made better if another example was shown instead of just Dr. Robert Kurtzman. Also, it would have been more interesting Michelle added another state’s problems instead of just Colorado. I was very impressed at the fact that this particular article was chosen. It was different from all other articles I have read in the blog. Usually people choose something about a crime scene and findings, however this one was more about the actual forensic profession.

Anonymous said...

This review was quite interesting to read, showing lots of things that I have never grasped before. The first thing that really stood out to me was the choice of the article that Michelle chose, I found it to a very useful topic considering the criteria that we are studying in class. The next thing that impressed me was was the way that she organized her review, making it super easy to follow along to, it also made it easier to pinpoint certain aspects in the review. Lastly Michelle did a great job of filling the reader in with the very important details without boring the reader. Her details were not over the top, but made strong points.
Although the review was phenomenal there are a few things I thought Michelle could improve upon. The first being the long term effects of the problems that she stated in her article, I was looking for you to expand upon those things. Maybe even go into details about what this could mean in the future. One last things I would ask for improvement upon is the structure of your critique, I thought at some points I was confused on the point you were trying to get across.
I learned many things throughout this article that somewhat shocked me. The article of choice opened my mind to things that are not heard in everyday news. One thing that really stood out to me was how long the autopsy could take (up to ten hours). I found this to be a truly interesting article.

Unknown said...

Pace, Jessica. "The Durango Herald 10/13/2015 | Forensic Pathologist’s New Job Leaves 10 Western Colorado Counties in a Bind." The Durango Herald. The Durango Herald, 13 Oct. 2015. Web. 14 Oct. 2015.
Michelle’s summary was incredibly thorough. She included a ton of details. This made sure we understood why the shortage of coroners is taking place. Her organization especially stood out. Breaking the review down into three separate parts seemed to be a very effective way of tackling the article. I also was easily able to tell why this article was significant by her method of showing the importance and shortage of coroners. She also highlighted the fact that since there is no medical degree required to be a coroner, there is a problem with autopsies not being thorough.
While Michelle did a great job, she did leave out a bit on why it is so hard to transported. The article said that the topography of Colorado is what makes it especially hard. This highlights the problem with Dr. Kurtzman leaving. She also could have expanded on more than just the example of Dr. Kurtzman because this problem, the article mentions, is all too common. Problems similar to this happen fairly often and the article is all about the ineffectiveness of the medical examiner system as it exists today. It highlights the changes that need to be made.
I found this article very interesting. It seemed very different and brought up a problem that I would otherwise never have considered. It shows the importance of Forensic science in the workforce and how in need of medical examiners we are.