Simulation of mirror surfaces for virtual estimation of visibility lines for 3D motor vehicle collision reconstruction
Forensic Science International, Volume 279, Issue null, Pages 106-111
Anja Leipner, Erika Dobler, Marcel Braun, Till Sieberth, Lars Ebert
I chose my article from the Forensic Science International Journal that discussed the Simulation of mirror surfaces for virtual estimation of visibility lines for 3D motor vehicle collision reconstruction. The article focused on the use of modern technology, specifically surface scanning tests for vehicle mirrors that utilize raytracing algorithms. By positioning mirrors in different angles and using these algorithms to take into account the effects of sunlight as well as driver headlights the the testers were able to simulate the exact field of vision that a driver had during an accident. They also used the simulations to improve the field of vision for driver rear-view and sideview mirrors therefore making the cars safer due to this new technology.
The findings in this article could be significant as in could possibly lead to the prevention of future traffic accidents if they have been caused by the driver’s limited field of vision. The 3D data can lead to changes in potentially adding new road signs or changing crossings if data demonstrates that the driver’s visibility lines were limited. This would benefit all of our society. Today drivers have many more distractions than ever before so having the best field of vision and reducing blind spots could make our roads safer. Eliminating one deadly traffic accident due to lack of field of vision could save a family heartbreak. As a new driver, any possible blind spots could lead to a dangerous or deadly situation. We should strive to have the best and safest cars available. Another important aspect of collision reconstruction is the ability for the those investigating an accident or crime scene to use these new technologies to better understand who is responsible. This can be important for court cases and those determining who was at fault.
The article clearly explained how to use modern technology to improve car safety as well as assisting law enforcement in deciding why an accident or crime occurred. The article while very detailed about how the technology is used, did not take into account how human error can affect the reason for accident. The article also was heavy on the data and not as detailed on the types of improvements would suggest for improving mirror safety.
Posted for K. Formato
3 comments:
Ayten El-Hennawy
Current Event 2
Kevin’s review of the article “"Simulation of mirror surfaces for virtual estimation of visibility lines for 3D motor vehicle collision reconstruction" was very interesting to read. I liked how in the first paragraph of kevin’s review, he explained how the article mainly focused on the use of modern technology and how they achieved that. I also liked how in the second paragraph he explained how the finding of this article could be significant in our society. Lastly, I thought kevin did a really good job relating this topic to our current society.
Although his review was pretty straight forward, i think kevin couldve went more in depth about the topic and provided the name of some of the devices that were used to scare the mirrors. I also think that kevin should have proved some definitions of the terms provided in the article as some may be confused while reading his review.
I think it's really interesting how it’s actually possible to improve the stimulation of mirrors especially since it would make a huge impact on people.
Ayten El-Hennawy
Current Event 2
Simulation of mirror surfaces for virtual estimation of visibility lines for 3D motor vehicle collision reconstruction Forensic Science International, Volume 279, Issue null, Pages 106-111
Anja Leipner, Erika Dobler, Marcel Braun, Till Sieberth, Lars Ebert
http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S037907381730302X
Kevin’s review of the article “"Simulation of mirror surfaces for virtual estimation of visibility lines for 3D motor vehicle collision reconstruction" was very interesting to read. I liked how in the first paragraph of kevin’s review, he explained how the article mainly focused on the use of modern technology and how they achieved that. I also liked how in the second paragraph he explained how the finding of this article could be significant in our society. Lastly, I thought kevin did a really good job relating this topic to our current society.
Although his review was pretty straight forward, i think kevin couldve went more in depth about the topic and provided the name of some of the devices that were used to scare the mirrors. I also think that kevin should have proved some definitions of the terms provided in the article as some may be confused while reading his review.
I think it's really interesting how it’s actually possible to improve the stimulation of mirrors especially since it would make a huge impact on people.
Simulation of mirror surfaces for virtual estimation of visibility lines for 3D motor vehicle collision
reconstruction Forensic Science International, Volume 279, Issue null, Pages 106-111
Anja Leipner, Erika Dobler, Marcel Braun, Till Sieberth, Lars Ebert
http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S037907381730302X
I read Kevin’s review of the article Simulation of mirror surfaces for virtual estimation of visibility lines for 3D motor vehicle collision reconstruction, the article was about the recent technology that uses 3D modeling to further analyze car accidents. One thing that the author did well in their review is they provided great reasons for why this article is important. He also made sure to summarize the article simply. Finally, the author also didn't write a confusing or too long review.
Although Kevin did a good job, there could have been some improvements. Some sentences had small grammar errors but this did not affect the overall meaning of the review. He also could have included more quotes from the text to give better depth to the review.
Before reading this I had not heard about this new 3D modeling and I think Kevin is right it really could save a family heartbreak. I learned a lot from reading this review and think that this is an interesting topic that should be studied more.
Post a Comment