Thursday, April 19, 2018

"Forensics Helps Widen Architecture's Mission"



Forensic Architecture is a research group which uses architectural rendering software to investigate cases for lies, crimes and human rights violations. Eyal Weizman, the founder of the research group stated that “When a state commits a crime, it cordons off an area, which is the privilege of the state. That site becomes a work of architecture, defined by the cordon. A prison by definition is architecture. You can try to break through the state cordon via leaks, media images, satellite photographs. And when they’re not available, memory is a way around the cordon. In any case, the cordoned area is our ‘building site.’” When asked about how Forensic Architecture related to the work of an architect, Christina Varvia, Forensic Architecture research coordinator stated that “What we do is in the tradition of ‘paper architecture. Except we expect results. As architects, we’re also trained to bring different people together to produce a design. But instead, we synthesize evidence.” In London of last year, a Bedouin village was raided by Israeli police officers called Umm al-Hiran. Authorities said that during the raid, a villager intentionally ran over an Israeli officer, killing him, and they called it a terrorist attack. To look further into the case, the research group worked with ActiveStills, an Israeli-based photographic collective. Forensic Architecture used photogrammetry and collected, time-stamped and synchronized the images and videos of the raid to produce a virtual reenactment of the scene to be compared to the helicopter footage.
Forensic Architecture plays an important role in society, as it takes advantage of the rapid advances in technology. By being able to virtually reconstruct a crime gives investigators a huge advantage, especially if the evidence they were given, such as film footage, was not good quality nor was it clear enough to see exactly what happened. As there are more crimes, the ability to reconstruct a scene, taking a deeper look into the crime, decreases the chance of being falsely accused for a crime, when in fact that person did not do anything wrong.

The article, “Forensics Helps Widen Architecture's Mission,” was very interesting to read, and I learned more about the role virtual reproductions of crimes impact forensic science. However, I wished that the author had gotten more into depth regarding the forensic side of Forensic Architecture rather than focusing solely on the cases that they solved. I wished that Kimmelman had described the forensic process in more depth as well.

1 comment:

Unknown said...

Zixi Chen
Mr. Ippolito
Forensics
27 April 2018

Kimmelman, Michael. “Forensics Helps Widen Architecture's Mission.” The New York Times, The New York Times, 6 Apr. 2018, www.nytimes.com/2018/04/06/arts/design/forensic-architecture-human-rights.html?rref=collection%2Ftimestopic%2FForensic%2BScience&action=click&contentCollection=timestopics®ion=stream&module=stream_unit&version=latest&contentPlacement=2&pgtype=collection.

The review written by Michelle Coppola on the article named “Forensics Helps Widen Architecture's Mission” by Michael Kimmelman is very interesting to read. It opens with an introduction about Forensic Architecture and the research group that is related to the case. This clear opening is very helpful because it brings the readers to the main subject of the article quickly. Michelle also used two long quotes from the forensic architects to further explain the relationships between forensic architecture and research. The quotes enabled readers to listen directly to the experts on this subject. Also, in the second paragraph, Michelle explained in her own words about the use of forensic architect to make it more clear and to offer her own opinions on the strategy. This is a very good thing to do because it shows her understanding on the topic while simplifying the complicated topic for other readers.

Even though this review was very nicely written, there are some areas of possible improvements. First of all, it would be nice if Michelle provided some explanation after she cited the two long quotes in the first paragraph. In addition, the final paragraph can finish a little stronger if Michelle showed more understanding of the topic by brainstorming more possible ways for Forensic scientists to use architecture in their research.

This review was very interesting to read, and it showed me how helpful it would be if the investigators can reconstruct the crime scene exactly. This way it would be easier to test out the time it takes for each possible ways of committing a crime. Same as Michelle, I also wish that there was more description of the forensic process in depth.